その悲痛な歪みを今後において、削減への政策やその置かれている現状の正直さを見た上での全員で考えないといけない国が、今後の支援方針を含めて、話し合わないといけない。
その上で、G7の方やWHOの方も含めて、行なうべき正しき方向へと下方修正すべき助言者を決めるべきと思います。
自身では、説得力が利かないので、良い工夫しか言えませんし、色んな意味での一般人です。
ましては、不謹慎な方に入ると思います。
それでも支援の糸口が見えたら、意見を出す側に回りたいと思います。
よろしくお願いします。

In future, the country which has to think by all the members after seeing the policy to reduction and its present honesty placed has to discuss the sad distortion including a future support plan.
I think that I should decide the adviser who should revise downward in the right direction which should moreover be performed also including the direction of G7, or WHO.
Self, since persuasive power is not effective, I can say only a good device and am a civilian in various meanings.
Furthermore, I think that I go into は and the more imprudent one.
I would like to turn to the side which offers an opinion, when the clue to support can still be seen.
Thank you for your consideration.

双方の国で、理解力に深く、代弁者で有り、公平な見方が出来る外交官の方に、委ねる事と思います。
その信頼のおける方に、リストの成否と今後の国を挙げての復興への歩みを行うべきと見ています。
自身の意見は、これくらいに成ります。

I hope that you entrust the diplomats who are deep to the power of understanding, exist by a spokesman, and get a fair view in both countries.
I expect that I should perform the pace to the revival which mentions the success or failure of a list, and a future country to the reliable direction of it.
An own opinion grows at least into this.